Skip to content
Models · Apr 22, 2026

Anthropic briefly tested moving Claude Code to $100/month tier, then reversed the change

Anthropic silently updated pricing pages to restrict Claude Code—a coding agent feature previously available on the $20/month Pro plan—to Max tier subscriptions ($100–$200/month). The company reverted the change within hours after public backlash, citing miscommunication about an ongoing A/B test affecting ~2% of new signups.

Trust60
HypeSome hype

3 sources · cross-referenced

ShareXLinkedInEmail
TL;DR
  • Anthropic updated claude.com/pricing on April 22, 2026, to move Claude Code access from the $20/month Pro plan to $100+ Max plans, but reversed this within hours.
  • Amol Avasare, Anthropic's Head of Growth, clarified via Twitter that the change was part of a test affecting approximately 2% of new 'prosumer signups' and that existing subscribers were unaffected.
  • Anthropic acknowledged that updating the public-facing landing page and documentation for a limited test caused confusion and called the broad visibility 'a mistake.'
  • The reversal restored Claude Code access on the Pro plan, though the company provided no formal public announcement or apology.
  • Industry observers, including OpenAI's Codex engineering lead, noted the episode raised concerns about Anthropic's product transparency and positioning relative to competitors.

On April 22, 2026, Anthropic quietly updated its pricing page to restrict Claude Code—previously bundled with the $20/month Pro subscription tier—to Max plans costing $100 or $200 per month. The change appeared only on claude.com/pricing and not on support documentation, creating inconsistency that amplified confusion once users noticed. Internet Archive snapshots captured both the updated and reverted states within a 24-hour window.

Amol Avasare, Anthropic's Head of Growth, disclosed on Twitter that the update was part of a limited experiment affecting approximately 2% of new 'prosumer' signups, with no impact on existing Pro or Max subscribers. A subsequent clarification acknowledged that updating public landing pages and documentation for a narrow A/B test was an operational error; Anthropic subsequently reverted both, while stating the underlying experiment would continue invisibly.

The public-facing reversal occurred within hours of the initial update—roughly the time required for discussion threads to surface on Reddit, Hacker News, and social media. No formal announcement or statement of intent followed the reversion, leaving ambiguity about whether the test remains active, how results would inform future pricing decisions, or what threshold of user price resistance might halt the experiment.

The episode coincided with competitive pressure from OpenAI, whose Codex product engineering lead publicly reaffirmed Codex's availability across free and $20 tiers, characterizing Anthropic's handling as a missed opportunity to reinforce trust through transparent communication.

For educators, developers building on Claude Code, and regions where subscription costs represent material expense relative to income, the test—and its reversal without clarification—introduced strategic uncertainty about the product's accessibility roadmap, affecting longer-term adoption and build decisions.

Sources
  1. 01Simon Willison — everythingIs Claude Code going to cost $100/month? Probably not—it's all very confusing
  2. 02Internet Archiveclaude.com/pricing snapshot (April 21, 2026)
  3. 03Internet Archiveclaude.com/pricing snapshot (April 22, 2026 – after reversion)
Also on Models

Stories may contain errors. Dispatch is assembled with AI assistance and curated by human editors; despite the trust-score filter, mistakes happen. We correct publicly — every article links to its revision history. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Verify before relying on any claim.

© 2026 Dispatch. No ads. No sponsorships. No paid placement. Reader-supported via Ko-fi.

Built by a person who cares about honest AI news.